[Anna]

The topic may have been Forepay but the content was about Ebare and Forepay. I’m a critical reader and not in the habit of misconstruing anything.

You asked if we thought Ebare was a scam site did you not? If your topic is Forepay then why are you commenting on Ebare sellers using Paypal and Nochex?

[Anna]

You want us to discuss if we think Ebare has turned into a scam site? You want us to believe that Forepay have stolen their customer’s money?

Fallen out with them have you? Or been banned by them too? :huh:

First post on here and it looks to me as though you are only out to cause trouble. :dry:

[Anna]

Yep, some fantastic advice here Kylie. The buyer is a complete tosser by the sounds of it. You’ve done everything right and he has no right to be angry and take it out on you.

The problem with MPS is that there is so much distrust and disrespect on there that it would bring out the worst in even reasonable people because they are all expecting to be ripped off or scammed. The best thing you can do is get off there and bring your decent buyers over here where we at least discuss issues like adults instead of scoring points off each other…

[Anna]

Nigeria is a hotbed for scams whether they are postal or online. Don’t touch them with a bargepole.

[Anna]

Colin Farrell? Euww no, far too short and loves himself far too much…plus he smokes and swears…yuk.

:huh:

[Anna]

joe wrote:

I wouldn’t let what is said there bother you too much. There is that same group that likes to start crap. If you said instead that you thought it was a good idea, they’d be screaming that you were a pedo. Some people just get their kicks by talking through their arse on a forum board to start trouble. Look back for the panty trust thread in which these very same trolls were outraged at the thought of a group of sellers doing something to combat fraud and giving buyers a peace of mind.

Yes, I noticed the same names too. It doesn’t matter what the topic is they are right and you are wrong. They have decided it and therefore they won’t read what you say. They comment only on what they think you said…and then they congratulate each other on their intelligence.

I noticed that some of the posters were very sensible in their discussion, but they were drowned out by the idiots.

You did the right thing Solange, you know it, we know it but they just don’t want to see it.

[Anna]

I’m still reading the thread over on Ebanned. How can they be so thick? For some reason they are now arguing that an older woman should be able to pretend to be a younger woman – so it therefore it isn’t paedophilia and Solange and Serena are overreacting. How can a discussion about men wanting little girls’ knickers, and irresponsible women wearing little girls’ knickers for these men turn into a discussion about women wearing pigtails and pretending to be 18… and nobody notice?

Every time I pop over there I am always so much more appreciative of all the lovely sellers over here.

[Anna]

I always wondered why you two weren’t on the PT forum!!! 🙂

I’ve mentioned to Bill that you are having problems…hopefully we can get you on there too – you’re missed!! 🙁

[Anna]

Honey Bea wrote:

Bizarrely I think I will have to go for John Barrowman at this moment in time 😛
He is divine as Captain Jack and I love to deliver them personally – Hot off the press! :whistle:

I’m with you there – he is divine. I don’t care if he is gay!

[Anna]

So basically the stupid bints are claiming no responsibility?

Selling with good intentions? How naive can somebody get?

It’s sad that money means so much to them.

[Anna]

What a lovely post Sam 🙂

Well done you!

[Anna]

laculotte wrote:

Solange, Serena, although I already tried to register for the ebanned forum they still haven’ approved. So here’s my two cents on this. Should’ve been posted over there rather…

I read the cpy of the thread and find it sdisturbing that many of the sellers and buyers there actually defended wearing and / or preferring children’s underwear. I know even VS sells cute girly stuff with flowers and stuff on it, but advertising your panties as children’s is beyond the line which should be drawn in everybody’s head.

That was exactly the issue I had with the girl at the pantyhog auctions. Being small and petite and wearing ‘corresponding’ underwear is NOT the problem. It’s the way some girls advertise them. Please everybody mind your wording!

Absolutely. If you’re that titchy then wearing titchy panties isn’t the problem. Wearing little girl’s panties because you haven’t grown up yourself yet isn’t the problem. In my world there is a wide chasm between size XXXXS and Age 10. Plus don’t little girls’ panties have flowers and Disney characters and puppies on them?

The problem is telling everyone they are children’s underwear. Who the hell do they think is really interested in that apart from the obvious? Why does a grown man want titchy panties? For his titchy cock? Or for his titchy malformed brain?

The problem is wearing them by request. Again, who the hell do they think is interested in that? Who would request a woman to wear not just little panties that happen to fit her – but children’s panties.

Enabling a paedophile to enjoy his fantasies is morally wrong and unforgivable.

I’m researching offender profiling at the moment for my degree and it is very unsettling. Almost every paedophile, or rapist, or serial murderer has previous form. They nearly all started out doing those harmless little things like buying children’s items, flashing or watching women getting undressed, or mildly torturing school friends under the guise of ‘just playing’. All these minor offenses start to escalate. The offender gets braver. He is getting away with cautions, or even remaining undetected, literally getting away with it. So he thinks bigger, takes more risks…and then someone gets hurt – a lot.

Selling little girl’s panties may seem harmless to some but it may be the first rung on a very bad ladder…and at the top there may be a real little girl…

I’ve come to the conclusion that some sellers are just really really thick and need some issues spelling out to them.

[Anna]

Serena wrote:

There seem to be a growing number of sellers signing up for the directory without a link back to the Hog…

PK, is there anything we could do to remind them?

🙂

Remind them?

They should just be deleted.

Who has time to explain to stupid people about linking back etiquette?

[Anna]

It disgusts me that a seller is so busy thinking about the cash that doesn’t even consider basic morals and decency.

If you wear little girls panties for a buyer then you are fucked up in the head.

If you provide any form of children’s underwear then you are fucked in the head.

Next time you read about a little girl who was abducted, terrified and ripped apart from RAPE, you might just consider that the sick fuck’s fantasies were fuelled by your willingness to condone an ILLEGAL and sick activity.

If you approach a seller and request children’s underwear then you are FUCKED IN THE HEAD and you are not welcome in this community.

Anyone who asks me for such items will be reported IMMEDIATELY to the authorities who will then confiscate your computer and find further evidence of your sick activities. I will do everything I can to ensure that you are locked up and treated.

I fully expect and hope that every other seller feels the same way.

[Anna]

If Panty Hog has disappeared then it is well worth checking my blog. Anyone who did check it recently would know why Panty Hog was down and how long for.

B)

[Author]

Posts