[Anna]

Any other pupils who feel like misbehaving will get a taste of the same!!

Guess what, I have just acquired an authentic academic long black gown, can you picture me in it with my hair in a bun and my specs, tapping a long ruler against my thigh?

I’m a Noob too – bet you all thought I’d been around for years eh? Hey who said ‘It feels like it!’? C’mere….!!!

[Anna]

I can tell you as a psychology student that personality tests are very very flawed and only a small percentage of psychologists even believe in Personality Trait theories. But as me I just LOVE ’em and especially if they describe me to a tee (so obviously they are 100% accurate and scientifical not yet disproven *ahem*)

Mmm … [b]dark chocolate! Rich and luxurious, you’re the flavour of pure decadence. (In fact, we think we feel our hips getting bigger just thinking about you.) Utterly indulgent and as smooth as silk, you’re impossible to deny. Some might even call you addictive — and, truth be told, for those who love you, it’s usually a life-long craving. Poor fools. It’s not your fault you’re so irresistible. But you’re happy to let people worship at your altar — as long as they’re willing to wrap you up in gold foil (24-carat, mind you), you’re delighted to be adored. Sumptuous and intoxicating, you’re a truly tasty treat[/b].

[Anna]

[quote author=Love2Smell link=topic=1635.msg10344#msg10344 date=1165949659]

Having said that, you should know that there is a concerted effort to exaggerate the dangers of illegal drugs.  Those stories about believing that you can fly, and then killing yourself while under the influence are nothing more than urban legends.

and you don’t get eaten by dinosaurs? Nobody has ever dies by trying to fly? Are you sure Love2smell? I’m not planning on taking anything, it’s just that I like to know my options

:rolleyes:

[Anna]

Actually April it was [b]me who deleted your post. I deleted it because it was offensive to other users, vulgar and entirely inappropriate.

I won’t delete this post because I’d like admin to see it, hopefully they will decide to ban you. Clearly a deletion of your post wasn’t hint enough! I’d also like other members to see that we, as mods, have this sort of garbage to clean up. I haven’t time to spend contacting cretins like this to advise them that I have had to delete their posts because this sort of language isn’t welcome. I used to, now I don’t bother, it should be obvious to the most feeble-minded!

Abusive name-calling and threats is not tolerated on this forum, if you want to have sissy fantasies whilst you wank, I suggest you tootle on off and find an appropriate forum where you will be welcomed by like-minded folk. [/b]

[Anna]

That was really interesting Kez! I had to giggle a bit at the descrption of the artists behaviour, but looking at the style of those drawings I would say there were a lot more artists than I thought, who were on LSD!

No, I wouldn’t take stuff like that either. I can fly in my dreams so I’m sure I’d be trying to jump off tall buildings – not condusive to a long healthy happy life eh?

[Anna]

[quote author=Rachy link=topic=1632.msg10325#msg10325 date=1165838818]
Doesn’t mean you have to stop 😉 :laugh:

And the blog writing has been completely changed!

Thanks everyone  smt

*stern voice* I have looked over your resubmission Rachel and I’m pleased to see a drastic improvment in your work *peers over spectacles* Even though this work has been sufficiently corrected I still feel that you ought to receive a sound spanking to ensure that you give your future work every conceivable consideration *points to lap* now pull down those rather delicious french knickers and lay over my lap!

[Anna]

[quote author=Anna link=topic=1632.msg10322#msg10322 date=1165838591]
If you drop the ‘been selling for 17 months’ statement then yes

[color=purple]Oh heck, I sound like your teacher now!!

[Anna]

[quote author=Rachy link=topic=1632.msg10321#msg10321 date=1165838321]
Thanks Anna, good to hear your opinion too! *hugs*

So am I officially sorted as a ‘newbie’?! *looks a little lame as yes I am STILL asking questions*  :unsure:

If you drop the ‘been selling for 17 months’ statement then yes I think so because it is very misleading and other peeps may question why a seller who says she has been selling since July 05 is in the New Seller category.

You’ve actually been selling panties for only about 4 months so that makes you definitely in the New Seller section.

For those 17 months you were actually a Sock Pusher lol

[Anna]

[quote author=mikeguk link=topic=1632.msg10317#msg10317 date=1165837665]
Ok i`m not going into that any further ;)  lol

You fibber Mike, bet you’re dying to know the details lmao

[Anna]

[quote author=Cindy_PantyParadise link=topic=1632.msg10308#msg10308 date=1165828441]
I just read Rachy’s blog, that has now confused what is written here… quote “for the past 17 months or so I have been secretly selling my used panties, tights, socks and other various intimate fetish items!”

So would that mean that Rachy is a new active seller this year only, or an experienced longer seller who has been in the closet for a while  :cheer:

Hmmmm:huh:

Rachy was in the closet!! She kept that quiet, when did she come ‘out’ then?

Yes Rachy, get rid of that ’17 months thing’, cos supplying a sock addict isn’t the same as selling panties, then you can be a New Seller and nobody can say different.

smt

[Anna]

I don’t think other sellers would be upset either way (I’m not), the idea of the Awards is about adding to the fun of the fetish and showing appreciation to the sellers however long they have been selling.

It’s just a bit confusing, how do you define when someone starts selling panties?

Let’s see what everyone else has to say.

[Anna]

Some oldies but plenty of goldies.

Thanks Mike!

[Anna]

[quote author=Rachy link=topic=1632.msg10298#msg10298 date=1165797426]
Thanks PK and Anna 🙂

And I didn’t really see it as a break as I sold a few ‘one off’ pairs back in 2005, then had no actual website offering panties (nor did I offer a ‘worn panty service’), and did not actually start properly selling until August 2006. Therefore I haven’t been selling for over 12 months, it’s just that my first few sales were back in 2005.

Does any of this make any difference? I’ve mentioned all this in a few places on my site and blog, but despite this I know I have at least one nomination for ‘new seller’ from a regular, so will this have to be cancelled?

Take care and thanks so much for your help you two 🙂
smt
Rachy
xx

Oh right, sorry, I was going by your words hun, umm, dunno then. Difficult one this because having a site or not having a site isn’t a criteria as plenty of sellers don’t have one.

Difficult one.

[Anna]

Hi Rachy

If you’ve been selling since July 2005 then you’re not a new seller, just a seller who had a break. That’s how I understand it anyway. A new seller is someone who isn’t able to be nominated for Panty Seller of the Year. PS of the Year is over 12 months so surely a New Seller is under 12months?

Don’t lots of sellers have breaks? Jess did but she’ll be up for Panty Seller of the Year I expect.

Or have I misunderstood it?

[Anna]

[quote author=jazzy link=topic=1412.msg10283#msg10283 date=1165756810]
I’m over here Anna,feel free. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

:laugh:  Jazzy    :laugh:

        Just a thought.

I’m coming Jazzy, prepare yourself!

:cheer:

[Author]

Posts