[cherie]

Hey Karen, if you don’t mind my asking, who was it that was giving you a hard time on alt.com?? One of the guys or another Mistress?

x
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

OMG, Cindy, you…me…one of those incredible florida thunderstorms…{shivers}

Time to go prep some panties I think… smt

xox
Cherie

[cherie]

Wow, it’s monday afternoon, Leatherz’ aromatic bear isn’t here…and there’s FIFTY EIGHT guests online with no members but lil’ old me!

Actually, I don’t think *I’ve* ever seen so many guests here before…and usually when I’m around there’s not more than four or five members either…no point, just remarking.? Maybe Panty Hog is growing? :cheer:

xxx
Cherie

[cherie]

Here’s another one for you…

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=583&e=1&u=/nm/20050711/od_nm/italy_naked_dc

Krooze, if you’re sustaining damage from just the mention of DHKaren’s firm breasts, this Panty Aunty would advise you never to vacation in Italy!? :rolleyes:

xxx
Cherie

[cherie]

Thanks for the info Jess 🙂

Hope things get straightened out for her soon!

x
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

Behind the altar of the school chapel in college.?

What makes it even better is that it was a small Methodist college in rural Georgia – very conservative – and I was considered the class dyke at the time.? Nobody could figure out what I was doing with a guy!? *giggle*

xxx
Cherie

[cherie]

[quote author=Delicious Jess link=topic=255.msg1272#msg1272 date=1120862361]
To be honest I think Uk law on internet porn is pretty free reign at the mo, if you produce a site aimed at the American market then maybe it’s a different ball game. I think every single country is guilty of producing nasty porn (beastiality, child porn and rape) including the UK and the States. Money talks after all, law is just a blip to those kinds of people and the net is a BIG? place. It’s easy to get lost in if you don’t want to be found.

So true Jess!? Heck, nowadays folks could be producing porn in Singapore, hosting it out of Sweden, and running the business from the US.? And the people who are doing the truly nasty stuff like child porn are probably doing just that.

And thanks, btw, for the info on UK law? 🙂

And Cindy, I want you to know that *I* don’t think that your pics are at all tasteless or obscene, just that by the standards of US law yours would be classed right in there with the hardcore stuff, and folks just like you are now having to deal with these regulations.?

Like I said before, I think this law is more about picking on the easy target of porn than about doing anything useful to protect kids.

xo
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

lmao

Quizmaster Jazzy strikes again!

Here’s another for you…

Australia……….Down Underwear

xox
Cherie

[cherie]

Cindy, according to US regulations, the pictures on your site are porn just as surely as a XXX hardcore movie.? You too would be required to keep the age-verification records.

The problem with this view (that panties are not porn) is where do you draw that line?? I am speaking of the legal perspective here.? You may consider bestiality obscene and needing regulation, while your pics are tasteful and wholesome, but I guarantee you that there are plenty of people over here who would find your pics obscene.

I think you are right that the worn panty buyer is a different sort of customer to the more visually oriented guys, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that they don’t enjoy looking at more explicit pictures or that the visual guys don’t like more tasteful stuff.? In fact, I think that most of us (guys AND girls) are bored with the “let it all hang out” style of porn that has been so prevalent.? There’s not really much excitement in yet another close up of some penis going into some vagina, which I think is why “amateur” porn has become so popular.

Although, having said that, I think you are likely right about the panty-buying guys generally preferring more of a teasing approach…in fact, I think this could be said of fetishists in general.? It makes sense, since the focus of the person’s passion is on the fetish object and not the act of intercourse.? What do you fellas have to say?

xox
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

I actually considered myself a submissive up until a couple of years ago, when I had a not-so-great experience with a Dom I met online.? I came out of it thinking “I could do so much better!”? so I started to try my hand; and I VERY soon realized that I had always had a tendency to dominate which I had been struggling against.? I’m bossy (in the nicest possible way? 😉 ),? extremely picky, and – most important IMO – better organized than 99% of guys.? So I am always one step ahead of them, you see?? :cheer:

The funny thing to me is that, even though I was going that route, and even though I had such a thing for lingerie myself, it never occurred to me that I would really get off on playing with crossdressing subs (which is how I define a “sissy”) until one approached me shortly after starting my site.? Which is how I wound up being the PHog “Sissy Mistress” and offering sissy training services.

Now I am looking for a permanent (or at least long-term) sissy to serve me in the flesh.? *grin*? I prefer to do the “recruiting” as then I get to choose what I want

(which, BTW, is a tall, thin, literate fellow with large hands and some variety of uk accent…in case there are any sissies out there who wish to apply, lol!)

I “recruit” from several places for this…alt.com has been good for me, and the local BDSM club.? In-the-flesh is tricky because there has to be a period of getting to know somebody, establishing boundaries and such, before you can get into any real playing and some guys just don’t have a clue about this.

As for my online services,? I’ll take on anyone who can pay me, so long as they don’t seriously piss me off, lol!

I put a lot of effort into devising training programs for my boys, making them their own webpages, really getting to know them and what their “buttons” are, and trying to help them develop into happier people, not just ones who’ve wanked off on command a few times.?

The biggest thing that ticks me off is when guys don’t appreciate this.? Many of them seem to think that the sexual thrill I get compensates for my spending hours working with them, and believe me fellas, it does NOT – I can have a better orgasm in five minutes with nothing but my own hand!? What I get out of it really is the thrill of being adored, worshipped – and the best way of proving your adoration, as far as I’m concerned, is to put your money where your mouth is.? 😛

Or come over and mow my lawn, hehehe!? ?:rolleyes:

xox
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

Krooze, I’m longing to hear about the pool table with the panties in your mouth…. 😉

Cindy, you have got to be the most skilled masturbatrix I’ve ever met!? ?smt

Leatherz…love the exhibitionist teddies!  :cheer:

xox
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

Just came across it while doing some shopping? :cheer:

Here’s another question for ya’ll…have you found that any medications will change the quantity, smell, or taste of you juices?

I know antihistamines will dry you right out.  😛

I’m taking a mess of antibiotics now, so I’m constantly checking (looking out for the dreaded thrush!? :rolleyes:) and I suspect that my juices taste more musky than usual…but maybe I’m just being paranoid? :laugh:

xox
Cherie

[cherie]

Another thought…

It seems to me that if we REALLY wanted to protect or kids from accessing porn sites, a better solution would be to require all such sites to carry accurate ICRA labels.? Then give some federal funding to the ICRA, so they can continue to develop filtering technology and provide FREE parental protection software.

If the software is free, concerned parents have no excuse for not using it, and any sites found to be in violation can be prosecuted.

What do ya’ll think?

x
Lady Cherie

[cherie]

[quote author=leatherznzpice link=topic=255.msg1236#msg1236 date=1120761134]And a few cases thrown out will prove it unworkable!

Yes, that is the hope!

I suppose it’s possible that some shady webmasters will now be discouraged from using stolen pics, but remember webmasters always were accountable for their pics – if they didn’t hold the age verification records they ought to have been able to point to the producer who did (this is how the law WAS).? If they didn’t respect the law then, why should they now?

Still, some of the newer and bolder shysters may now think twice about nicking from us? 😛

As for the kids…

The type of porn that Cindy talks about, bestiality, rape, etc does NOT come from the US.? That stuff is explicitly outlawed in most states, and outlawed by virtue of being considered obscene everywhere else.? Anybody producing stuff like that over here would already have been facing prosecution!? So how could a law that only applies to US pornmeisters curb it??

I see your point about not always being able to have your eye on what your kids are doing, especially as the kids get older and more likely to go looking for smut.? But I just don’t think increasing the recordkeeping burden is going to help that.? The big problem with kids and internet porn, it seems to me, is not so much the quantity of porn as it is that some people use trickery – misleading site names, keywords, etc – to get non-porn-seeking folks to click to porn sites.? Like calling it “britney.com” and using birtney spears related keywords, then having the site be a banner farm of porn links.

If the law were to stand I think what would happen would be a centalization of porn production and distribution – putting it all back into the hands of the “big money” companies that have the legal clout to stand up to lawsuits and the resources to keep all those records.? You wind up with porn on the net that it just as readily available to the minor who does a search for “gangbang sex,”? but now all he sees when he gets there are the standardized images of sex/women that big money always produces – bleach blonde, fake tits, fake orgasms etc – instead of the diversity of the “amateur” porn we have now.

Just one more note – as an American observer of American politics, I see this as one of those instances where lawmakers, anxious to be seen to be doing something, make a brouhaha over something not very relevant and pass a law that is unworkable.? ?”Protect kids from porn” is one of those hot-button issues here that no politician will disagree with for fear of losing the next election, and what with all the concerned parents around it makes a handy distraction from, say, the threat of terrorism.

Cindy, a quick question from your first post – does Britian (or Germany) not already have some kind of regulation requiring producers of porn to keep age documentation records on their models, etc?? Laws about that have been on the books here for decades!

xox
Lady Cherie

Who loves a good discussion!

[cherie]

The problem is NOT that adult business are now required to have age documentation for models, actresses, etc – that’s been on the books for years.  It’s that the recordkeeping requirements have become MUCH more stringent.

Now, for instance, it’s not enough for a video production company to keep age verification records on all their actors/actresses.  Now they also have to have such records cross-referenced to EVERY stage name said performer has EVER used.  Each and every picture in a magazine technically must now have it’s own set of these records.  And – this is the kicker – it’s not enough for just the producer/publisher to keep the records – every brick-and-mortar sex shop is supposed to have these records as well, for all the merchandise they carry.

Now just imagine a store with a stock of hundreds of videos and magazines trying to keep such records!

This law is emphatically NOT about keeping kids out of porn, it’s about trying to shut down adult businesses by loading them with impossible to fulfill bureaucratic requirements. 

(btw, they used the same tactic way back when marijuana was made illegal – they passed a law saying you had to have a special tax stamp to sell it, then made the tax stamp impossible to get.)

From what I’ve been reading the new law is unlikely to stand up to the inevitable court challenge, but that’s not going to prevent the holier-than-thous from tearing down as many businesses as they can in the meantime.

I could be wrong, but I don’t *think* this law is at all likely to decrease the amount of porn accesible to kids on the net – after all, it doesn’t even apply to businesses based outside of the US or (as far as I know) to people with “personal” (i.e. free) smut sites.  It might, but really, isn’t that what PARENTS are for?  To keep an eye on what their kids are doing?  Put it this way – if you left your kid in a room with a pile of playboy mags, would you then get riled at Hugh Hefner for making the porn available to your kids?

And as for it protecting we panty-sellers from copyright infringment or photo theft, I can’t imagine how it will help with that either – it’s not like you can report the theft of your pics to anyone now.  If you did chances are you’d find YOURSELF under investigation instead! 

Cherie

[Author]

Posts